BackingMinds gains an institutional anchor for its Nordic founder search
A fund commitment that can broaden the search for early-stage businesses.
BackingMinds is trying to reach Nordic founders whom established venture networks miss. A SEK 220 million commitment from the European Investment Fund gives its third fund an institutional anchor for that search. The next test is whether this support helps turn a broader sourcing strategy into more investable companies.
On this page
An anchor for the third fund
Announced on 20 October 2026, the commitment is worth about €20 million. EIF is the first institutional investor in BackingMinds Invest III and expects its participation to help attract other institutions. InvestEU supports the operation through its Social Impact Equity component.
This is a commitment to an investment fund. The announcement does not establish Invest III’s total size or the amount already invested in individual startups.
A wider search, with a commercial purpose
BackingMinds describes itself as an early-stage technology investor with an industry-agnostic approach. Its starting point is the founder rather than an established venture network, and it combines investment with practical support as companies grow.
Invest III will primarily target Sweden and the wider Nordic region, including women, founders with immigrant backgrounds and businesses outside capital cities. Its intended investments include commercially promising companies addressing environmental or social problems.
What founders can take from it
The practical implication is an additional route to early-stage backing for teams whose geography or networks make conventional introductions harder. Founders still need to explain the business: the customer problem, the technology and how the company can grow.
EIF’s role may help BackingMinds raise institutional capital around that approach. It does not by itself determine which founders receive investment. The useful signal is the fund’s stated search pattern: building outside a familiar network can be relevant to its thesis rather than a reason to rule out an introduction.